Friday, August 1, 2014

Field Teams Collect Valuable Storm Surge Data



Last autumn, Super Typhoon Haiyan made landfall in the Philippines with maximum sustained winds of 195 mph. This was the most intense tropical cyclone at landfall on record (Masters 2014). Haiyan generated a massive storm surge that devastated the city of Tacloban, and other locations in the Eastern Visayas region of the Philippines. This catastrophic storm surge enabled Haiyan to kill at least 6,300 people (National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council), although the death toll may be as high as 8,000 (Aon Benfield 2014).

 Super Typhoon Haiyan generated a catastrophic storm surge that killed thousands of people last year in the Philippines. Photo: Noel Celis/AFP/Getty Images


Following Haiyan’s surge, Hurricane Hal’s Storm Surge Blog featured a series of photos provided by Aslak Grinsted, an assistant professor at the Center for Ice and Climate, Niels Bohr Institute, in Copenhagen, Denmark. These photos depicted people standing in a parking lot in front of trees with bark removed at approximately 2.5 – 3.0 human heights. After featuring these photos on the November 14, 2013 post, a Filipino man living in the United Kingdom wrote to me and identified the location of those photos as the parking lots adjacent to Tacloban Airport. Once the location was identified, I was able to estimate an approximate storm tide height of 6.5 m (21.33 ft) in this location. In this way, international collaboration occurred between people living in Denmark, the United Kingdom and the United States, which provided some of the first estimates of Haiyan’s storm surge height.

Although such collaboration provided a quick estimate of Haiyan’s storm surge height, observations provided by field work teams can help provide an extensive network of accurate high water marks. Such networks are essential for understanding localized flood patterns, particularly in areas with a limited amount of tide gauges or with localized flood patterns. Post-storm surge field work teams may observe evidence of high water levels through different methods. Some of the most common methods include observing high water marks or mudlines inside or outside buildings, as well as observing the height of rafted debris, damage trimlines or tree bark removal.

Hermann Friz, an associate professor of civil engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech), has led several field projects to record high water marks following high-profile coastal flooding events. He has conducted field work both in the U.S. and abroad, including locations such as the U.S. Gulf Coast, and coastal locations in the countries of Oman and Myanmar.

Multiple trees on Ship Island, Mississippi, provided similar heights of tree bark removal, which revealed maximum water levels from Hurricane Katrina. Photo provided by Hermann Fritz.

Along the U.S. Gulf Coast, Fritz led a team to collect high-water marks in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida, in 2005, following Hurricane Katrina (Fritz et al. 2008). The team produced a unique dataset with 153 data points in these states. More than one-third of these observations were obtained on barrier islands, so this dataset is useful for validating both onshore and offshore surge heights. These high-quality data provide the latitude, longitude and height of high water, as well as the type of observation, such as mudline inside a building, tree bark removal, damage trimline or rafted debris.

A 7.65-m (25.1 ft) rod does not quite reach the height of tree bark removal on East Ship Island, Mississippi, following Hurricane Katrina. The tree bark removal at this site extended to 8.2 m (26.9 ft), indicating an extraordinarily high storm surge at this location. Photo provided by Hermann Fritz.


Damage trimline elevations on structures along coastal Mississippi reveal high water marks from Hurricane Katrina. Photo provided by Hermann Fritz.


In 2007, Fritz and a field team collected high water marks in Oman, on the Arabian Peninsula, following the passage of Tropical Cyclone Gonu, the most intense tropical cyclone on record in the Arabian Sea (Fritz et al. 2010). The team collected 25 high-water marks, which provide the location and water height, as well as the type of observation. Such work provides a pioneering effort that will be useful for validating storm surge models in a region that observes relatively few tropical cyclones and has sparse recorded data. This field team observed that relatively steep bathymetry along some sections of coastline decreased storm surge heights, but increased wave magnitudes.

Photo and quote taken from Fritz et al. (2010). Direct quote: Wadi flooding due to discharge and storm surge induced backwater at Muscat (Photo credit: Department of Meteorology, Sultanate of Oman).

In 2008, Fritz and a team of researchers constructed a storm surge dataset in Myanmar, following Tropical Cyclone Nargis, which killed more than 138,000 people (Fritz et al. 2009). The storm surge peaked at over 5 m (16.5 ft) near the landfall location, and storm surge inundation traveled inland more than 50 km (31 miles). This team took on quite an adventure, as they encountered poisonous snakes, and had to avoid areas that might be infested with saltwater crocodiles. The extent of coastal erosion in this area was perhaps best depicted by a golden Buddhist stupa, which was originally built on land, but was seen 150 m (492 ft) offshore.

Hermann Fritz and a team of researchers collected high water marks in coastal Myanmar, following Tropical Cyclone Nargis in 2008. Note the Buddhist Stupa protruding from the water in the upper left of this image, approximately 150 m (492) offshore. This structure was originally build on land. Photo provided by Hermann Fritz. 


Various other organizations have deployed field teams to collect storm surge data during the past decade. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is a government agency in the U.S. that has conducted outstanding field work. FEMA has contracted URS Group, Inc. to collect data in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama following Hurricane Katrina. They completed three reports, which provide more than 1,000 high water marks (URS 2006a; URS 2006b; URS 2006c). FEMA also provides nearly 400 observations from Hurricane Ike’s storm surge in Texas and Louisiana (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2008). FEMA used such observations to construct surge elevation contour maps, which estimate maximum surge heights along the coast. For example, see: http://www.fema.gov/response-recovery/hurricane-katrina-flood-recovery-1.


Regional overview map for Hurricane Katrina's surge elevation contour maps, which are provided for each of the green squares. The area in yellow depicts the inundation zone. These maps are based upon the surveyed coastal high water mark elevations. Source: FEMA.



REFERENCES

Aon Benfield, 2014: Annual Global Climate and Catastrophe Report. Available at: http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20140113_ab_if_annual_climate_catastrophe_report.pdf.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008: Hurricane Ike in Texas and Louisiana. Mitigation Assessment Team Report. Available on the web at: http://www.fema.gov/library/file?type=publishedFile&file=757_ape_final.pdf&fileid=71147ed0-b6a2-11df-97ce-001cc4568fb6.
Fritz, H.M., C. Blount, R. Sokoloski, J. Singleton, A. Fuggle, B.G. McAdoo, A. Moore, C. Grass, and B. Tate, 2008 : Hurricane Katrina Storm Surge Reconaissance. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134, 5, 644-656.
Fritz, H.M., C.D. Blount, S. Thwin, M.K. Thu, and N. Chan, 2009 : Cyclone Nargis storm surge in Myanmar. Nature Geoscience, 2, 448-449.
Fritz, H.M., C.D. Blount, S. Thwin, M.K. Thu, and N. Chan, 2009 : After the Storm. Backstory in Nature Geoscience, 2, 528.
Fritz, H.E., C. Blount, F.B. Albusaidi, and A.H.M. Al-Harthy, 2010: Cyclone Gonu Storm Surge in the Gulf of Oman. Published in Charabi, Y., Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change. Published by Springer Science and Business Media.
Masters, J., 2014: Super Typhoon Haiyan: Strongest Landfalling Tropical Cyclone on Record. Dr. Jeff Masters’ Blog on Weather Underground, posted November 7, 2013. Available on the Web at: http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/super-typhoon-haiyan--strongest-landfalling-tropical-cyclone-on-recor.
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, 2014: NDRRMC Update: Updates re the Effects of Typhoon “YOLANDA” (HAIYAN). Republic of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines. Report issued April 17, 2014. 2 pp. Available on the Web at: http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1177/Update%20Effects%20TY%20YOLANDA%2017%20April%202014.pdf.
URS, 2006a: Final Coastal and Riverine High Water Mark Collection for Hurricane Katrina in Mississippi. Prepared by URS Group, Inc. for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Final edition completed March 14, 2006. Available at: https://www.fema.gov/pdf/hazard/flood/recoverydata/katrina/katrina_ms_hwm_public.pdf.
URS, 2006b: High Water Mark Collection for Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana. Prepared by URS Group, Inc. for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Final edition completed March 30, 2006. Available on the web at: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/hazard/flood/recoverydata/katrina/katrina_la_hwm_public.pdf.
URS, 2006c: High Water Mark Collection for Hurricane Katrina in Alabama. Prepared by URS Group, Inc. for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Final edition completed March 3, 2006. Available on the web at: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/hazard/flood/recoverydata/katrina/katrina_al_hwm_public.pdf.

Monday, July 7, 2014

Super Typhoon Bart (1999) May Provide Insight on Neoguri Surge Potential



Super Typhoon Neoguri is a powerful typhoon packing winds of 130 kts (150 mph). The cyclone is forecast to strengthen to a category-5 typhoon, with winds reaching 140 kts (161 mph) as it tracks towards Japan. Image:NOAA


Super Typhoon Neoguri is now a well-developed tropical cyclone, packing winds of 130 knots (150 mph). The Joint Typhoon Warning Center forecasts strengthening of this typhoon, as maximum sustained winds may reach 140 knots (161 mph), while it tracks west of Okinawa. Such intensification would make Neoguri a category-5 hurricane if it were located in the Atlantic Ocean.

This typhoon is forecast to track W of Okinawa, before curving towards the NE and making landfall on the Japanese Island of Kyushu. Although Neoguri is forecast to weaken to a category-3 typhoon by landfall, storm surge correlates better with pre-landfall winds than wind speeds at landfall (Jordan and Clayson 2008; Needham and Keim 2014), so a relatively large storm surge may still occur.



Super Typhoon Neoguri is forecast to pass W of Okinawa as a category-5 tropical cyclone, then curve towards the NE, before making landfall as a major tropical cyclone on the island of Kyushu, Japan. Source:Weather Underground



Neoguri may take a similar track towards Kyushu as Super Typhoon Bart in 1999. Bart also passed west of Okinawa as a category-5 typhoon, before moving NE and making landfall on Kyushu with maximum sustained winds of 115 mph. Maximum sustained wind speeds of Bart and Neoguri may be comparable as they track west of Okinawa and move towards landfall in Kyushu.

Bart generated a 3.5 m (11.5 ft) storm surge in Yatushiro Bay (Kawai et al. 2009), which tied it for first place with Typhoon Vera in 1959 as the highest storm surge in Japan’s history, according to SCIPP's global SURGEDAT dataset. SURGEDAT has identified the location and height of 11 historical storm surge events in Japan since 1911. Unfortunately, Bart’s surge peaked near the time of a spring high tide, which further exacerbated storm surge flooding. This enabled flood waters to reach the roofs of one-story houses, while the surge claimed 12 lives (Kawai et al. 2009).

Super Typhoon Bart (1999) followed a similar track and had similar intensity as the forecast track and intensity of Super Typhoon Neoguri. Bart passed west of Okinawa as a category-5 typhoon, and then weakened to a category-3 typhoon with winds of 100 kts (115 mph) at landfall on Kyushu, Japan. Map Source: Unisys Corporation.


However, when Bart made landfall on Kyushu, it passed just west of Yatushiro Bay, enabling the storm to push a tremendous amount of water into the bay on strong southerly winds. We still do not know if Neoguri will take a similar track. If Neoguri tracks farther east, for example, it would pass to the east of Yatushiro Bay, enabling the strongest winds to blow offshore out of the bay. Therefore, while Bart's surge history may provide some general insights about surge potential from Neoguri, slight differences in typhoon track may result in large differences in surge heights at specific locations.




Super Typhoon Bart tracked just west of Yatushiro Bay, Japan, enabling strong south winds to push a 3.5 m (11.5 ft) storm surge into the Bay. This surge level is tied for Japan's highest water level in SCIPP's SURGEDAT database. Slight differences between Bart's and Neoguri's tracks may drastically change surge heights at specific locations. Image and info: Hal Needham



STORM SURGE OFTEN VERY LOCALIZED ON ISLAND NATIONS

On island nations like Japan and the Philippines, a slight change in a typhoon track can change surge levels at a particular location dramatically. Deep inlets and bays, as well as jagged island coastlines oriented in different directions makes surge levels very localized in these countries. This was made obvious last autumn, when powerful Super Typhoon Haiyan generated a catastrophic, but localized storm surge in the Philippines. Bays and inlets near the location of landfall greatly enhanced surge levels around places like Tacloban, which observed a wall of water more typical of a tsunami than a storm surge.

Neoguri will be monitored very closely and slight changes in track forecast will likely result in large changes in storm surge heights. Coastal populations should be aware that storm surge in such situations is very localized, as one location may observe a high storm surge, but another location 20 km away may observe little or no storm surge. The most vulnerable areas to surge will be locations that are exposed to strong, onshore winds.

References:
Jordan II, M.R., and C.A. Clayson, 2008: Evaluating the usefulness of a new set of hurricane classification indices. Monthly Weather Review, 136, 5234-5238.
Kawai, H., N. Hashimoto, and M. Yamashiro, 2009: Real-time Probabilistic Prediction of Storm Water Level at Japanese Ports. Proceedings of the Nineteenth (2009) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, June 21-26, 2009. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).

Needham, H.F., and B.D. Keim, 2014: Correlating Storm Surge Heights with Tropical Cyclone Winds at and before Landfall. Earth Interactions, 18, 1-26.


Thursday, July 3, 2014

Hurricane Arthur Bears Down on North Carolina

Hurricane Arthur was bearing down on North Carolina this evening as a category-1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 90 mph, according to the National Hurricane Center. They predict that Arthur may intensify to a category-2 hurricane at landfall or it's closest approach to the coast.

Hurricane Arthur's eye is clearly visible just southeast of Wilmington, North Carolina, on this radar image provided by Weather Underground's WunderMap. The National Hurricane Center said Arthur's eyewall was just east of Cape Fear.

The National Hurricane Center forecasts that storm surge could inundate land areas, reaching the following heights if the timing of peak surge occurs at high tide:

3-5 feet above ground level in the coastal areas of North Carolina within the hurricane warning;
2-4 feet above ground level in Pamlico and Albemarle Sounds;
1-3 feet above ground level in Southern North Carolina and Northeastern South Carolina;
1-3 feet above ground level in Extreme Southeastern Virginia.

Keep in mind, those are not storm surge heights above mean sea level, but actually above ground level. 

Extensive storm surge history is available for North Carolina, as this region is familiar with visits from hurricanes and tropical storms. The Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University has developed an extensive dataset, as well as an interesting fact sheet about historic storm surges in North Carolina. This page is called, Cataloging all Available Storm Surge Measurements for the State of North Carolina: The National Storm Surge Database, and is available on the Web at: https://shoreline.wcu.edu/Katie/SS_SEGSA_2011.pdf.

 The Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University has developed extensive storm surge data and mapping capabilities, as well as useful information about past surges in North Carolina

This website shows the capabilities of their database combined with GIS mapping, which enables them to consider how storm surge is affected by various hurricane parameters, like hurricane track and angle of a hurricane's approach to a coastline. In regards to North Carolina storm surges, they provide a top 10 list of high water marks available in their dataset, including the following observations, which were the highest in North Carolina for each of these hurricanes:

Storm Name    Year    High Water Mark (ft)      Location
Hazel               1954              18                       Brunswick
Isabel              2003              16.2                     Dare
Fran                1996              15.4                     New Hanover
Ione                1955              15.1                     Craven

Western Carolina University's National Storm Surge Database project has developed various technological tools, including a Storm Surge Viewer and other products that enable users to view storm surge observations and hurricane tracks.

The Southern Climate Impact Planning Program (SCIPP) has also developed extensive storm surge data for North Carolina. So far, SCIPP has identified 989 storm surge observations in the state. These data are provided for 46 separate tropical cyclones since 1857.

SCIPP has also developed mapping work that provides historical storm surge/ storm tide heights, as well as the tracks of historic hurricanes that produced such high water marks. For example, the image below is a SCIPP map of Hurricane Hazel's track and high water marks in 1954. This map is not intended to be a comparison to Arthur's storm surge in any way, but rather a snapshot of the capabilities of this database and mapping work.

 SCIPP map of Hurricane Hazel's track and storm surge/ storm tide observations in 1954. According to the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University, Hazel's 18-ft storm surge was the highest in the history of North Carolina.