After a major coastal flooding event, we want to know the
maximum water height in various locations. Such information helps us better
understand the process that triggered the event, and also helps us learn about
localized flooding patterns.
Post-storm field surveys generally rely on trained field
teams to go into an area and measure high-water marks. Such teams are generally
looking for various clues that indicate the maximum water height. Signs on the
landscape include the height of rafted debris, damage trimlines, tree bark
removal, as well as mudlines or waterlines inside or outside standing
structures.
Massive storm surges are so catastrophic that they destroy tide gauges as well as most buildings, making it difficult to obtain high water marks. After such disasters, measuring the height of tree bark removal is sometimes the best way to estimate surge heights. Photo: Noel Celis/ AFP/ Getty Images
A researcher from Denmark has already begun analyzing
photographs for evidence of high-water marks, following Super Typhoon Haiyan’s massive
storm surge in the Philippines. Aslak Grinsted, assistant professor at the
Centre for Ice and Climate, at the Niels Bohr Institute, in Copenhangen,
Denmark, has estimated the height of tree bark removal in numerous photographs from the impacted
area. Such analysis is very valuable, because it provides some of the earliest
estimates of surge height in the region.
Aslak Grinsted, assistant professor at the
Centre for Ice and Climate, at the Niels Bohr Institute, has begun estimating Haiyan's storm surge level by analyzing the height of tree bark removal in photos
Aslak sent me several photos earlier this week. Note the
utter devastation in these photographs, as well as the fact that few structures
remain standing to provide water lines or mudlines. In such massive surges, the
height of tree bark removal often provides the best estimate of water levels,
as debris floating on the top of the water column during the surge event rubbed
off the tree bark.
Image #1 from Aslak Grinsted
Image #2 from Aslak Grinsted
Image #3 from Aslak Grinsted
Aslak compared the height of tree bark removal to the height
of people in some of the photographs. In one photo, he estimated the height of tree
bark removal to be approximately 2 human heights, while he estimated a water
level of 2.5-3 human heights in another photo. If we assume the average human
height in this area to be approximately 1.7 m (5 feet 7 inches), these
approximations would provide estimates of surge levels reaching 3.4 m (11.2 ft)
and 4.25-5.10 m (13.9-16.7 ft).
In order to accurately estimate the storm surge height, it is
necessary to know the ground elevation for each observation, because storm
surge is measured as the water height above the predicted tide level. Field
teams will eventually provide accurate measurements, but in the meantime,
online crowdsourcing may provide the best method for early surge estimates.
Here are some questions you could help with:
Here are some questions you could help with:
- In the photos that Aslak used to identify tree-bark removal, does anyone know the name of the location and/or the approximate ground elevation?
- Have you seen any photographs that contain clear signs of tree bark removal, rafted debris, mud lines, water lines, or damage trimlines on buildings/ structures?
If so, please send photos to Hal Needham at the following
email: hal”at”srcc.lsu.edu. Please make sure to provide a citation and weblink for any photographs, if possible.
Aslak’s initial work this week has shown us the potential
for all of us to participate in post-disaster field work, even from across the
globe. As our world becomes more connected, opportunities should continue to
open up for increased collaboration after such catastrophes.
Image #1 is from the airport parkinglot. Image # 3 is also from the airport. I am convinced that the red roof can be seen here in google maps:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=+11%C2%B0+13.671'%2C+125%C2%B0+1.506'
Image #2 also says airport in the caption but it is hard to identify where exactly.
@VinnyBurguu sent me a link to a blueprint of a planned expansion of the airport with some spot elevations. It is here: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=591415&page=78
I dont know what vertical reference they use but i doubt it is mean sea level.
This info may also be useful: http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/rlr.diagrams/664.php
I think the coordinates in the blueprint must use PRS92: http://www.namria.gov.ph/prs92
ReplyDeleteAnother image... http://www.kryzuy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/5082286-3x2-940x627.jpg - look at the central pillars of the house.
ReplyDeleteI think it must be located roughly here based on the mountains in the background and the standing building:
http://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=11%C2%B0+13.497'%2C+125%C2%B0+0.224'
This telephoto from Iglesia ni Christo is very good to gauge the surge height
ReplyDeletehttp://cdnimages.abs-cbnnews.com/topics/tvpatrol/2013november/111213_inc.jpg
There are some 40ft containers (which are ~2.6m tall) in the photo and judging from the debris and the location of the highest container etc. I get a surge of ~6.2m.
ให้คุณได้มั่นใจว่าเราจะไม่ทิ้งคุณไปไหน เว็บมั่นคง ปลอดภัยจ่ายจริง และจ่ายเร็วที่สุดใน 1 นาที ให้คุณได้มั่นใจเราและเชื่อใจเราได้เลย สล็อต PG
ReplyDelete